![]() ![]() Xmplify uses its knowlege of your document's current structure and its definition (DTD or XML Schema) to provide intelligent auto-completion suggestions. The verification results are automatically kept up to date as your edit your document.Īuto-complete XML based on its DTD or XML Schema ![]() If your document specifies a DTD or XML Schema, Xmplify automatically uses that to verify your document's content. Xmplify provides an Outline view of your document that shows its structure, and automatically keeps the Outline up to date to reflect the latest edits. See your document's structure at a glance Xmplify analyses your XML as you type, and maintains a rich set of meta-data so it can provide intelligent editing aids and suggestions according to your document's content and the current editing context. Xmplify XML Editor is a native Mac app built from the ground up for Mac OS X, and provides a number of powerful features to make working with and manipulating XML simple and intuitive: via java.exe -jar saxon-he-10.5.jar -xsl:searchScript.xsl -s:input.xml -o:output.xml and within searchScript.xsl provide a simple XSLT that will copy any found element to output.xml and add the XPath to the search result (if that's too big, just remove location=""), e.g.Xmplify HomePage | RecentChanges | EditorIndex | TextEditorFamilies | Preferences You shall change the Workbench setting editor options > max file size to 40MB so your file will be nicely rendered and then load your XML file into the XML editor and trigger XPath based search.įYI, Saxon is rather fast in my experience, so it may be worth to create an XSLT for searching. Even if you cannot name all hierarchy levels but need w:* somewhere, it's most likely still much faster.įYI, notepad++ with XML Plugin also offers limited XPath support, so you may try that one.įYI, if you have access to an inubit installation (because it's an enterprise service bus / business process engine it is only licensed by organisations like companies but not individuals), it is IMHO worth a shot. by providing an absolute XPath like /w:document/w:body/w:p/w:r/w:t/w:inst this would most likely speed up your search massively. If you could narrow down which elements could be relevant, e.g. One major factor is that your XPath is starting with // so every XML element of the whole document will be checked for the predicate you gave - it is the same as if you wrote /descendant-or-self::*. Feel free to migrate if there’s a better Stack for it. I debated whether to post this here or on StackOverflow, but since I’m specifically not doing this programmatically, I decided this was probably the better place. ![]() What is the reason for this? Why is XPath (apparently) so resource-intensive? Does it differ between OSes (mine is macOS Sierra)? The other applications I’ve tried using were not as egregiously bad, but opening the document and running any kind of XPath query still took minutes, and their memory usages were countable in GB too, so it’s not just Xmplify being inefficient. That seems rather excessive to me for a single XPath query in a single file, even if it is a fairly big file. After about 15 minutes of going at around 100% CPU, Xmplify was now using 60 GB of memory, and my OS was telling me that I had run out of application memory and needed to start force-quitting stuff. Then I tried to perform this XPath query (I’m looking for all tracked insertions consisting of the string en): //w:ins That took about three minutes, and with no other documents open Xmplify’s memory usage rose to about 1 GB. I’ve tried with Xmplify, QXmlEdit, SublimeText with the XPath extension, etc., and they all suffer from the same problem: just opening the file is ridiculously slow and hogs an awful lot of memory, and doing an XPath search is nigh impossible.Īs an example, I just tried opening the file in Xmplify. I’m doing this ‘manually’ rather than programmatically, by opening the file in an XML editor and searching there. I have a large XML file (about 37 MB-it’s the underlying XML file in a Word document of about 350 pages) that I am trying to search through with XPath. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |